Sunday, January 20, 2013

Images of Christ (series) pt 1, "The Good Shepherd" by Rev Steven R Mitchell, for Mountain View United, Aurora, CO


Images of Christ (series)

The Good Shepherd

By Rev Steven R Mitchell

Mountain View United, Aurora 1-20-2013

Based on John 10:11-18

 

        Today we are embarking on a journey that will look at some of the images of Christ found in scripture.  We often hear or read references to Christ as a care giver such as: good shepherd.  We have images of Christ as being submissive when we refer to him as: the lamb, or as the suffering servant.  Jesus is also compared as a plant when we say; Jesus is the branch, or true vine.  Jesus is a revealer of truth when he is said to be the light of the world.  We give Christ titles like: bridegroom, head of the church, or corner stone.  We honor Christ as life giver when we refer to him as bread of life.  It is my hope that as we learn more about how Christ is described throughout scripture, we will be better able to see the relationship between these descriptions of Christ and our own lives.  And by understanding our relationship with Jesus, be able to become more like these images ourselves.

        I have chosen to begin this series with the image of the Good Shepherd to correspond with the remembrance of Martin Luther King, Jr. Dr King, in my opinion, is one of the best examples of the Twentieth Century’s good shepherds. 

This has been a week of revelations and of stimulation, both of the mind and more importantly of the heart, for me.  I was able to attend the annual board meeting of the Aurora Inter Church Task Force with Kathy Groth, our churches representative.  I also attended a breakfast, one of many functions going on this week in honor of Dr. King with Wayne Laws, where we heard two riveting speeches addressing disunity and brokenness as it is experienced through racism in this country.  I watched a PBS special that chronicled the Mormon Church’s teachings on sexuality and its involvement in California’s proposition 8, which repealed equal rights and protections given through marriage.  This weekend has provide stimulating conversations with Paul’s daughter and son-in-law as we spoke about the goals and visions of a new church in which they are members of and how changes toward being a religious institution in their former church were so dramatic,  prompting them to leave and join this new fellowship.

So how does Jesus saying, “I am the good shepherd.” relate to these experiences I just spoke of?  How does racism, bigotry, homophobia, and new church starts relate to the concept of “good shepherd?” 

Within this story, we hear how Jesus sees himself and his relationship to those who follow God’s teachings as well as his relationship to God.  We hear Jesus say, “I am the Good Shepherd”.  But what does Jesus mean when he says, “good”?  Is this the same as when we say, “Mary Jo is a good teacher”, or “Mark has good health”, or “I will give you a good amount of money.”  In our understanding of the word good, we most frequently think of “attribute”, “quality or quantity of”, even “morally just or righteous.”  We tend to think of “good” as opposite to “evil”.   Yet a more accurate way of understanding the word “good” as it was used in Jesus’ day would be more likened to our understanding of “Model”.  I am the Model Shepherd” would be more of how the first century listener would understand. 

It may seem like it’s the same meaning and I am just playing around with semantics, yet there is a subtle difference from an “attribute” to that of “model.”  Jesus is speaking about the relationship and trust that exists between, in this case a shepherd and his flock, or between teacher/prophet, or even parent, student, congregation, or child.  When I was in seminary, my New Testament Professor was Dr Gam Shea.  Dr Shea was from Burma and he modeled for those of us in his classes what it means to be meek, another concept most severely misunderstood in our Western culture. 

Model then can be understood as a “way of life”, the way one reacts automatically.  Jesus says that a “model shepherd” is in such relationship to his flock that he would go so far as to die for them in order to have their life spared.  Jesus’ relationship to the people of God was a reflective model to his relationship with God.  Jesus’ relationship was so deep with God that he often referred to God as his parent.  We read about the intimacy Jesus had with God, by the amount of time he spent in prayer and in his references to God.  The authority in Jesus’ words reflected his relationship with God.

Not only did Jesus speak about his relationship as shepherd for the Hebrews, who saw themselves as God’s chosen people, but he tells them that there are other sheep that are outside of the flock (non-Hebrew) that he will bring in.  This was the offensive part of Jesus’ message. 

We don’t see its offensiveness when we read about it in the context of John, but how many times has the Christian church found it offensive when we have had “model prophets” such as the Dr Rev Martin Luther King, Jr tell us that those with dark skin are equal in the site of God?  It cost Dr King his life, preaching that message.  How welcomed is the message that we still do not look at the Native American with equality?  How offensive is it to many Christians in this country when there are voices that rise up and demand marriage for all people, or that those who are in the LGBTQ community are also fully accepted by God.  The Mormon Church funded proposition 8 with millions of dollars.  I hear Christians argue that basic medical care should not be a right to all people in this country.  And I could go one with multiple examples such as: the death penalty, immigration reform, and housing for the poor.

My question for us is, “Where do we as a community of faith draw boundaries?”  “How big is our pen?”  “What model of shepherd” do we as a congregation live by?  Is the word “political activism” or “social justice” one of our boundaries that we do not wish to cross over?  Yes, we call ourselves an “open and affirming/more light/reconciling” congregation, yet what is the prevailing color of this family?  We have 106 or so members, yet almost a third of those members do not attend any church sponsored function.  Is it because of some type of boundary we have placed before them?

Jesus says that there are wolves that attack the herd.  What are the wolves that attack us?  What are some of the wolves that attack the relationships and trust within our families and between our friendships?  What are some of the wolves that attack us spiritually and work at detouring our spiritual growth?  What are some of the wolves that eat away at the relationships in this church family?

If Jesus were with us this morning he would be asking us to think about our relationship with God.  How open are we to allowing the Holy Spirit space within our hearts, so that we might be more deeply nourished by love, assured that we are not alone, and the sense of peace that comes when we let God take the helm of our lives.

We are starting a series of monthly breakfasts to start educating ourselves on a variety of social issues, as a way of seeing where we as a congregation would most want to focus our energies.  We are in early conversations with another church that is looking for a new partner in ministry.  We have youth that need model adults for learning how to cope with life’s challenges as they grow up.  As a church, we need to seriously understand what Jesus is about, of what he means when he says, “He is the model shepherd”, so that we can work at continuing to be that “model shepherd” for those who we meet. 

I asked at the beginning of this morning’s reflection as to how does: racism, bigotry, homophobia, and new church starts relate to the concept of “good shepherd?  All of these are symptoms of what happens when wolves are attacking God’s people.  Just where are our boundaries and how do we need to widen the circle so that the “model shepherd” can include everyone?  Amen

No comments:

Post a Comment